Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner discusses the burdens of his position, why he felt it was necessary to bailout the financial system and the paternal role taken by the federal government:

Economic forecasts are a funny thing. If they attempt to project anything beyond the short-run (one year), be very skeptical. But short-run forecasts are not iron-clad either. I have a great time on this site making fun of economists and their predictions. Guessing what the intricate convergence of millions, if not billions, of different economic agents and their decisions will be, is kind of an exercise in futility. So if I were to predict what crude oil will do in 2010, I’d give you some markers to help you make your own decision long before I took a specific barrel price and defended the position.

Ron Paul and Paul Kanjorski have a good debate on Ben Bernanke’s reappointment hearings, H.R. 1207 (auditing the Fed) and the Federal Reserve in general. It is a very good debate and definitely worth watching:

If economics is supply and demand, wouldn’t it be useful for companies if they could pull demand out of a hat; if they could create new marketplaces out of thin air, instantly cashing in on the first-mover advantage. There they would stand, titans of industry, as the lone player in a market.

The power of information, and misinformation, is immense. Google provides access to a vortex of data, images and videos with the press of a button (particularly when a user is “feeling lucky”). With the Internet age comes major concerns about privacy. What people find out about you on the Internet could influence whether you get that scholarship or government grant. It could be the reason why you’re turned down for health insurance. It could even be why you attract Facebook stalkers. In any case, there may be a way out of this unstoppable exposition of your personal life: move to a remote village. The Onion News Network reports:

The question is, can the Fed take enough money out of the economy without sending us back into a severe recession, or will the excess money lead to high inflation. Personally, I’m predicting some pretty vicious stagflation is coming our way.

What’s disheartening is the American health care system desperately needs reform, but first we’d have to stop the wrong reforms being proposed before actually fixing the system. It’s a long road ahead.

We at SwiftEconomics would love to wish our readers a Happy New Year and apparently, so do all the city, state and federal legislatures. According to CNN, starting on or near January 1st, 40,697 new laws will come into effect. Some are very sensible, such as restictions on human trafficking. Others, well others simply epitomize the nanny state at it’s petty and invasive worst.